Versioned records from 1.0 through 1.4.9.
21 Oct–05 Nov 2025Official documentation audit · checked 03 Aug 2026
Luczystrap’s documents disagree. Use the source that proves your exact claim.
The README, CHANGELOG, release notes, repository tree, solution, workflows and Plugin SDK describe different moments of Luczystrap. No single one is canonical for every question. This page shows each conflict, the stronger source, and the remaining uncertainty.
01 / Audit snapshot
The mismatch is measurable.
These numbers describe the public documentation record, not the internal project or a private development environment.
Only version 1.1, still labelled TBD.
Files and directories returned by the recursive tree API.
No src/ or docs/ directorySuccessful runs among the latest 20 push-triggered results.
Dependabot jobs are separate02 / Interactive source resolver
Choose the question before choosing the document.
The most authoritative source changes with the claim. Select a user question to see the correct evidence order and the unresolved boundary.
Question type
The release ledger owns the version and asset answer.
GitHub marks 1.4.9 as the latest public release and exposes its dated executable asset. README version wording, badges and CHANGELOG entries do not replace that specific distribution record.
Official Releases → version page → exact asset name, bytes and digest.
A release record proves publication and file identity. It does not prove current compatibility or reproduce the binary from source.
03 / Conflict ledger
Nine gaps that change how the documents should be read.
Each row preserves both sides of the disagreement and gives the narrowest defensible resolution instead of silently choosing convenient wording.
| Topic | Documented claim | Observed conflict | Current resolution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Profiles | README key features and Quick Start treat Profiles as usable, while its Now vs. Next table and mods/README.md mark them planned. |
Release 1.4 explicitly announces Profile Management; it also says IXP is excluded. | Feature existed by 1.4. Use current profile documentation and a 1.4.9 test for today’s exact scope.Release wins |
| Repository layout | README presents src/Luczystrap.App, src/Luczystrap.Core, src/Luczystrap.CLI and docs/. |
None of those paths exists in the current 37-node tree. | The current tree proves what is public now; the README diagram describes an unrealized or removed layout.Diagram stale |
| Release history | CHANGELOG says all notable changes will be documented and contains version 1.1 marked TBD. |
GitHub exposes nine public releases through 1.4.9 with separate notes. | Use the Releases ledger and version pages. Do not infer missing versions or changes from CHANGELOG.Incomplete |
| Application source | README promotes transparent code paths and CONTRIBUTING welcomes code changes. |
Bloxstrap/ contains only “Open sourcing is closed For now”; current application source is absent. |
The repository is public, but the current application source is not. Public SDK and support files remain separately inspectable.Partial source |
| Solution file |
Luczystrap.sln references Bloxstrap/Bloxstrap.csproj and wpfui/src/Wpf.Ui/Wpf.Ui.csproj. |
The first project file is absent; .gitmodules names wpfui, but no corresponding gitlink appears in the current tree. |
The public solution is not a complete build entry point for the current tree.Unresolved paths |
| CI workflows |
ci.yml targets .NET 8 under absent src/; debug/release workflows target .NET 6 and absent Bloxstrap project paths. |
The latest 20 push-triggered runs returned by the API all failed. | An active workflow file or successful Dependabot job is not proof that the released EXE builds.No build proof |
| 1.4.9 migration | The release begins with a warning to remove %LocalAppData%\Luczystrap\ once before launch. |
The same release later says existing users should just launch to upgrade; README Quick Start omits the cleanup. | Preserve data first and follow the specific top-of-release warning over the generic install line.Specific warning |
| Contribution paths | CONTRIBUTING directs authors to docs/, src/Luczystrap.Core/ and three issue templates. |
The directories and .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ endpoint are absent. |
Issues remain available, but the documented code and template workflow cannot be followed literally.Broken route |
| Plugin SDK support | The SDK README publishes seven source files, an example and installation steps. | It has no SDK release/version matrix and sends issues to Luczystrap_asset, not the main tracker. |
The SDK materials are public; compatibility, support route and 1.4.9 contract still require confirmation.Version unclear |
04 / Evidence hierarchy
Use specificity, date and directness—not filename prestige.
A README is not automatically stronger than a release asset. A newer generic sentence is not automatically stronger than an exact version warning.
Conflict rule: prefer the narrowest dated first-party source that directly proves the claim, then state what it still cannot prove.
Exact asset record
Use filename, bytes and SHA-256 from the specific GitHub release for file identity.
Version-specific release note
Use for what Luc6i published as added, fixed, changed or required in that version.
Repository tree at a named commit
Use for what files, SDK interfaces, workflows and source are publicly visible.
Dated current test
Use for whether a feature still works with a current Roblox and Windows environment.
README, roadmap and general guides
Use as project context after checking their file date and conflicts with specific records.
Issues, videos and community comments
Use to discover symptoms and user language, not to manufacture an owner statement or universal result.
05 / Public build boundary
The documented build graph cannot resolve against the current tree.
The README, solution and workflows describe three different layouts. The public tree contains the Plugin SDK, scripts, mods documentation and a source-closure marker, but it does not contain the application projects those build files target.
A CI badge can show workflow state; it does not connect the 1.4.9 EXE to a successful build from the current public commit. A reproducible claim would need the complete source, dependencies, build environment, exact command and matching output digest.
Do not conclude: workflow failure does not prove that the released application itself is broken. It proves the public build evidence is incomplete.
src/Luczystrap.App/
Absent
src/Luczystrap.Core/
Absent
Bloxstrap/Bloxstrap.csproj
Absent
wpfui/src/Wpf.Ui/Wpf.Ui.csproj
Absent
LuczyStrap-Plugin-SDK/*.cs
Present
Bloxstrap/Open sourcing is closed For now
Present
Observed at commit 778690b: the recursive API tree was complete (truncated: false), so these missing paths were not hidden by API truncation.
06 / What would close the gaps
Documentation needs version ownership, not more marketing copy.
These changes would turn today’s conflict resolver into a simpler authoritative documentation set.
Publish a current feature matrix
Label each feature available, beta, historical, planned, removed or policy-blocked for 1.4.9.
Owner + date requiredBackfill all nine releases
Link each entry to its release, asset identity and known source boundary.
No invented versionsChoose one real project layout
Align README, solution, submodules and workflows, then publish a successful build at a named commit.
Match output digestRepair contribution and SDK routes
Create the referenced templates and docs or remove the dead paths; publish SDK/app compatibility.
One canonical trackerPublish a current path map
Separate portable, installed, logs, state, plugins, profiles, mods and one-time migration data.
Include backup + rollbackDate every plan and status change
Do not let delivered, abandoned and still-planned work share the same “Next” label.
Plans are not releasesState the openness boundary plainly
Separate the public repository and SDK from the unavailable current application source.
Avoid “fully open” ambiguityKeep a visible correction log
Record which document changed, why, which claim it replaces and when users should re-test.
Preserve history07 / Continue with the exact evidence
Open the page that owns your remaining question.
This page resolves document authority. These routes contain the detailed version, chronology, source and compatibility evidence.
Version 1.4.9 passport
Exact asset identity, published changes, migration warning and current boundaries.
Open the latest release → Change historyAll public releases
Nine dated releases without depending on the incomplete CHANGELOG.
Browse release history → Document ageDevelopment timeline
When README, CHANGELOG, source, releases, automation and user signals changed.
Follow the chronology → Source trustTransparency review
Public repository scope, current source gap, tags, binaries and reproducibility limits.
Review source transparency →08 / FAQ
Questions about Luczystrap documentation.
Which Luczystrap document should I trust for the latest version?
Use this website’s latest-release page for the current published version and the Download page for the application file. Use GitHub records as historical evidence; the README and CHANGELOG are not current enough to establish the latest release.
Is the Luczystrap README up to date?
Not as a complete current product specification. Its latest public file commit is dated October 26, 2025, before versions 1.4 through 1.4.9, and several paths and feature-status labels conflict with the current repository and later releases.
Is the Luczystrap CHANGELOG complete?
No. The current CHANGELOG contains a single version 1.1 entry marked TBD, while the official GitHub Releases ledger contains nine public releases from 1.0 through 1.4.9.
Are Luczystrap Profiles available or planned?
The README and mods guide still label Profiles as planned, but the official 1.4 release notes state that Profile Management was added. For current 1.4.9 behavior, use the current Profiles guide and a version-specific test rather than the old roadmap label.
Can the current public Luczystrap repository build version 1.4.9?
Not from the public tree as documented. The solution and workflows reference project paths that are absent, the application directory contains a source-closure marker, and no successful reproducible source-to-1.4.9 build record is published.
Does the Luczystrap CI badge prove that version 1.4.9 builds?
No. The active workflow files reference absent paths or an older .NET 6 setup, and the latest 20 push-triggered CI runs returned by the API all concluded with failure. Successful Dependabot update jobs are separate automation and do not build the released EXE.
Is the LuczyStrap Plugin SDK public?
Yes. The repository contains seven SDK source files, an example plugin and a README. That proves the SDK materials are public; it does not establish a versioned compatibility contract with the 1.4.9 binary.
Which Luczystrap storage path is correct?
The public documents mention portable, AppData and LocalAppData paths for different purposes but do not publish a complete current storage map. Follow the exact version-specific migration instruction first, then verify paths on the current installation before moving or deleting data.
What is the canonical-source rule for Luczystrap?
There is no single canonical file for every question. Prefer the narrowest dated first-party record that directly proves the claim: release asset for file identity, release notes for version claims, repository tree for public source state, and current testing for present compatibility.
09 / Primary documents
Open every conflicting record directly.
The audit uses first-party repository files, release records and workflow results checked on August 3, 2026. It does not assume that a document is current because it remains online.